
Good Safety Management Should Lead to Good Quality
Michael Low
has worked for over 25 years in the food industry, both in the UK and here in
the US. He has over 10 years experience as a plant manager, and has spoken at
international conferences on the subjects of safety, training and technology.
He is currently the senior principal at Pinnacle Total Management, a
consultancy specializing in manufacturing operations performance improvement.
He can be contacted at mrtlow@ptminc.biz and the company website is
www.ptminc.biz
Historically, in the food industry product quality was considered to be the
primary objective. As our understanding of management principles has grown
safety is now more often seen as the most important area of focus. We have
learnt that by concentrating on safety, which is one of the most difficult
issues to manage, we can utilize the experience and skills developed to also
significantly improve both product quality and productivity. Failure to address
safety can result in high costs both on a personal and financial level.
In this article, we will examine how by putting safety at the top of the
management agenda we can also gain important benefits elsewhere in the
organization, thereby justifying safety’s preeminent position.
Here are some of the elements of a good safety program.
-
Real commitment and leadership from the top of the organization.
-
Establishment of a Site Safety Committee involving all levels of the
organization.
-
Regular departmental “tailgate” safety meetings.
-
Maintenance of good statistical records of safety incidents.
-
Regular Safety training.
-
Completion of a Job Safety Analysis for all job functions.
-
Behavioral Auditing programs.
Careful consideration of this list will prove that all of these elements are
transferable to other aspects of the operation, in particular quality.
Real commitment and leadership from the top of the organization – If the
senior management shows an enduring and active participation in safety, they
set an example for all levels of the organization. The focus this provides
ensures that safety (or other matters similarly handled) becomes part of the
operating culture within the organization.
Establishment of a joint Site Safety Committee – Brings together all
parts of the facility and provides a bridge between senior management and the
shop floor. It enables managers to demonstrate their commitment to the safety
program and, through their active participation, provides strong leadership
towards resolving difficult issues. It also introduces the process of joint
problem solving and teamwork.
Regular departmental “tailgate” safety meetings – This allows the line
supervisors to demonstrate their own commitment to the well-being of their team
and develop their rapport with their team’s members, built around an issue that
involves all of them personally. It provides an opportunity for supervisors to
develop as leaders and their subordinates to become involved individually,
either through making presentations to the group, or by working on a team to
solve a particular problem. This concept, or philosophy, is easily translated
into other performance improvement programs covering areas such as quality and
productivity.
Maintenance of good statistical records of safety incidents – A good
safety program will generate a large amount of data on such things as incident
reports, audits, suggestions and defects. This volume of data is difficult to
manage and requires considerable resources to handle efficiently. Once such
systems are in place they can easily form the basis for handling data from
other areas such as quality assurance and production performance.
Regular Safety training – OSHA mandates a considerable amount of routine
training of employees. Depending on the nature of the operation this often
requires repeated emphasis. Setting up the system to record and deliver this
training, including having personnel skilled in delivering such programs, is
also of great value in providing the necessary training to effectively run a
good quality system or other training needs within the organization.
Completion of a Job Safety Analysis for all job functions – Preparing a
safety hazard analysis is a difficult and painstaking task. Each aspect of the
job function has to be analyzed and recorded along with the appropriate actions
to eliminate or minimize the risks associated with each task. A quality based
HACCP analysis requires similar techniques and personal attributes as those
required to do a safety hazard analysis, except that the emphasis is on
reducing or eliminating risk to the product rather than to personnel.
Behavioral Auditing Programs – These programs are becoming increasingly
popular and are focused on changes to people’s behavior as a means of improving
safety. During these audits people are reminded about how their own actions, or
inactions, will affect the safety of themselves and their fellow workers. These
programs have been very good at eliminating risk within the workplace.
Similarly, quality is most often adversely impacted by people’s actions or
omissions. It is not difficult to demonstrate that a quality based behavioral
auditing system can be of value.
This list is by no means exhaustive and it is not intended to oversimplify the
level of commitment involved, but does demonstrate that the solutions to
product quality and safety are analogous. In general, the application of sound
management techniques to both issues should ensure a high standard of safety
and quality within the organization. Therefore, a manager who successfully
places safety at the top of his agenda, and the philosophy that is integral to
a safety conscious organization, is also going to be able to see benefits in
other areas of the operation.
Many organizations have difficulty with recording and analyzing data accurately.
As with a quality system a good safety system will generate a vast quantity of
data. Generating the systems to store, manage and analyze that data requires
considerable management time and effort. Such systems, once developed, can
easily be used as the basis for other data storage needs.
back to top
|